- IRI:
- http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo-basic.owl
- Current version:
- Version 1.0 ($Revision: 1.13 $)
- Other visualisation:
- Ontology source
Copyright (c) 2006-2008, Regents of the Research Group Ontologies in Medicine (Onto-Med), University of Leipzig, Germany.
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification,
are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list
of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list
of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
materials provided with the distribution.
3. Neither the name of the Research Group Ontologies in Medicine (Onto-Med), University
of Leipzig nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products
derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR
CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER
IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT
OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
Classes
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Abstract
- has super-classes
- Individualc
- is disjoint with
- Concretec, Space time entityc
Abstract individuals are independent from time and space (they are not in time and space).
Examples: the number "2" or pi.
[RH, 2006]
Amount of substratec back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Amount_of_substrate
- has super-classes
- Presentialc
An amount of substrate is a presential, namely the matter of some material object. Amounts of substrate follow different identity criteria than material objects, i.e., they instantiate different persistants.
Appropriate connotations of "amount of substrate" are "stuff" (in the common understanding) or "mass term" (in linguistics).
[FL, 2008-03-13]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Category
- has sub-classes
- Conceptc, Symbol structurec, Universalc
- is in domain of
- instantiated byop
- is in range of
- instance ofop
- is disjoint with
- Individualc
Categories satisfy the following conditions: (1) Categories can be instantiated; (2) Categories can be predicated of other entities.
Categories are defined intensional-with-an-s. They are, therefore, closely related to language.
[RH, 2006]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Change
- has super-classes
- Occurrentc
- has sub-classes
- Continuous changec, Discrete changec
- is disjoint with
- Eventc, Historyc
A change refers to a structure centered around two presentials, which are boundaries of one and the same process. If they exist at coinciding time boundaries, the change comes close to notions in the literature like "punctual" or "instantaneous event" as well as "moment" (in a temporal reading). Alternatively, the presentials may be boundaries at the opposite ends of a process of arbitrary extension.
Either notion of change is relative to contradictory conditions between which a transition takes place. These conditions refer to some collection of pairwise disjoint subcategories of one category.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Concept
- has super-classes
- Categoryc
- is disjoint with
- Symbol structurec, Universalc
Concepts are categories that are expressed by linguistic signs and are present in someone’s mind.
[herre-h-2006--a, p.6]
Continuous changec back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Continuous_change
- has super-classes
- Changec
- is disjoint with
- Discrete changec
A continuous change is a change such that
(1) its process boundaries exist at non-coincident time-boundaries,
(2) any two non-coincident process boundaries of its process are distinguished with respect to the reference category and
(3) any two coincident process boundaries exhibit no such distinction, i.e., no discrete changes of the same reference category.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
Continuous processc back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Continuous_process
- has super-classes
- Processc
A process is a continuous process if it can be partitioned such that the partition contains only states or processes within a continuous change. Those states and changes must be based on the same reference category.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
Discrete changec back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Discrete_change
- has super-classes
- Changec
- is disjoint with
- Continuous changec
A discrete change is a change at coincident time boundaries, for which a recognizable difference exists. That means, there is a category with two disjoint sub-categories such that each of these is instantiated by exactly one of the process boundaries in the change.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
Discrete processc back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Discrete_process
- has super-classes
- Processc
Discrete processes have a partitioning into an alteration of discrete changes and states.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Event
- has super-classes
- Occurrentc
- is disjoint with
- Changec, Historyc
Events are processual structures comprising a process, and one of its extremal process boundaries. The latter must further satisfy a condition which differs from the condition applicable to all other boundaries of the process. I.e., the extremal boundary instantiates a sub-category of the event's reference category which is disjoint with that category instantiated by the remaining process boundaries. [FL, 2008-03-13]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#History
- has super-classes
- Occurrentc
- is disjoint with
- Changec, Eventc
Histories are processual structures which consist of a process and a number of presentials which are constituents of the boundaries of that process.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
Material objectc back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Material_object
- has super-classes
- Presentialc
- framed byop some Topoidc
- is disjoint with
- Material boundaryc
A material structure is an individual which satisfies the following conditions:
it is a presential, it occupies space, it is a bearer of qualities, but other entities cannot have
it as quality, and it consists of an amount of substrate, and it instantiates a persistant ("has identity").
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Occurrent
- has super-classes
- Processual Structurec
- has sub-classes
- Changec, Eventc, Historyc
- is disjoint with
- Processc
The category of occurrents comprises several categories that can be derived from processes.
[FL, 2008-03-06 based on part1-v.1.0.1, p.30]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Perpetuant
- has super-classes
- Concretec
- is in domain of
- exhibitsop
A perpetuant is a concrete individual which persists through time and exhibits presentials.
[FL, 06.03.2008]
Processual Structurec back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Processual_Structure
- has super-classes
- Concretec
- has sub-classes
- Occurrentc, Processc
- is in domain of
- has participantop
- is in range of
- participates inop
- is disjoint with
- Presentialc
The category of processual structures centers around the more intuitive notion of processes. It captures processes themselves and occurrents, i.e., primarily structures of several other kinds that can be derived from processes.
[FL, 2008-03-13 based on part1-v1.0.1, p.30]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Property
- has super-classes
- Individualc
- has sub-classes
- Relational rolec
- is in domain of
- property ofop
- is in range of
- has propertyop
- is disjoint with
- Relatorc
A property is a dependent entity which another entities has, i.e., that entity exhibits its property. Other common terms for property in natural language are characteristic, feature, quality, etc.
[FL, 2008-02-27]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Relator
- has super-classes
- Individualc
- is disjoint with
- Propertyc
A relator mediates between or connects entities. It is a dependent entity which depends on those entities connected.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
Social rolec back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Social_role
- has super-classes
- Rolec
- is disjoint with
- Processual rolec, Relational rolec
A social role corresponds to the involvement of a social object within some society.
[herre-h-2006--a, p.38]
Spatial regionc back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Spatial_region
- has super-classes
- Space entityc
- has sub-classes
- Topoidc
- is disjoint with
- Spatial boundaryc
Space regions are mereological sums of topoids.
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#State
- has super-classes
- Processc
A process is a state with respect to a category iff every of its process boundaries instantiates that category.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
Symbol structurec back to ToC or Class ToC
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Symbol_structure
- has super-classes
- Categoryc
- is in domain of
- has tokenop
- is in range of
- token ofop
- is disjoint with
- Conceptc, Universalc
Symbolic structures are signs or texts that may be instantiated by tokens.
[herre-h-2006--a, p.6]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Topoid
- has super-classes
- Spatial regionc
Topoids are connected compact regions of space. They have spatial boundaries.
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Universal
- has super-classes
- Categoryc
- is disjoint with
- Conceptc, Symbol structurec
Universals are immanent categories. They exist in re.
[FL, 2008-02-27]
Object Properties
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#abstract_has_part
Abstract has-part is the inverse of the abstract part-of relationship.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#abstract_part_of
The abstract part-of relation is denoted by p(x,y); the argument-types of this relation are not specified, i.e. we allow arbitrary entities to be arguments. We assume that p(x,y) satisfies the condition of a partial ordering, .i.e. the following axioms: reflexivity, antisymmetry and transitivity.
[RH, 2006 based on herre-h-2006--a, p.44]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#boundary_of
"Boundary of" connects boundaries to the entities which they bind.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#coincides_with
Coincidence is a relationship between space boundaries or time boundaries, respectively. Intuitively, two such boundaries are coincident if and only if they occupy “the same” space, or point in time, but they are still different entities.
[herre-h-2006--a, p.46]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#depends_on
This relation captures the notion of existential dependence.
[RH, 2006]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#exhibits
In the GFO-account of persistence, perpetuants exhibit presentials, i.e., the former ``exist through'' the latter at the time where the presential exists. With respect to persistants, presentials instantiate persistants.
[FL, 2008-07-10]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#exists_at
Presentials exist at a single time boundary.
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#framed_by
A presential is framed by a spatial region if the location which the presential occupies is a spatial part of that region.
[FL, 2008-02-27, based on herre-h-2006--a, p. 21]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#frames
A spatial region frames a presential if the location which the presential occupies is a spatial part of that region.
[FL, 2008-02-27, based on herre-h-2006--a, p. 21]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_boundary
The has-boundary relation connects entities with their boundaries, e.g. chronoids to time boundaries, topoids to surfaces, etc.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_left_time_boundary
Temporal regions have exactly one extremal left time boundary.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_participant
Temporally extended entities have participants.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_proper_part
The inverse of proper part-of.
[FL 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_property
Entities can have properties. In GFO, properties are individualized, and "has property" links an entity to its particular property.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_right_time_boundary
Temporal regions have exactly one extremal right time boundary.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_role
The inverse of role of.
[FL, 06.07.2008]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_spatial_boundary
Space entities may have spatial boundaries.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_temporal_part
The inverse of temporal part-of.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_time_boundary
Temporal regions have temporal boundaries.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_token
The specific relation from a symbol structure (a category in GFO) to an entity seen as an occurrence of that symbol structure, as a token of it.
[FL 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_part
The inverse of part-of.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#instance_of
The instantiation relation holds between an entity and a category. Put differently, the category is predicated of that entity, the entity is the instance of that category. Entities of all kinds can be instances, which results in categories which have individuals as instances or categories which may have categories as instances, such as "species".
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#instantiated_by
Inverse of instance of.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#left_boundary_of
Left boundary of a temporal region.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#necessary_for
An entity is necessary for another one if the latter is required for the former to exist.
[FL 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#occupied_by
Presentials exist in space, and the space entity occupied by a presential is uniquely determined (where a fixed granularity is assumed).
[FL, 2008-02-27 based on herre-h-2006--a, p.21]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#occupies
Presentials exist in space, and the space entity occupied by a presential is uniquely determined (where a fixed granularity is assumed).
[FL, 2008-02-27 based on herre-h-2006--a, p.21]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#part_of
The relation between parts and wholes.
The union of several domain-specific part-of relationships not contained explicitly in gfo-basic, like spatial part-of or part-of among material structures.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#participates_in
Intuitively, objects participate in processes, for instance. In GFO, participation accommodates the GFO approach to persistence, i.e., at least presentials can participate in processes. Moreover, it is useful to extend the notion of participation also to other temporally extended entities.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#played_by
The inverse of plays-role.
[FL, 06.07.2008]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#plays_role
Entities can play roles with respect to some other entity which provides a context for that role. The plays-role relationship links an entity with its role.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#projection_of
If, for instance, a process happens during a certain time, i.e., some temporal region, that region is the projection of that process (to time).
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#projects_to
Links an entity to its temporal extension.
Entities which are in time are related to the corresponding temporal regions by projects to. Moreover, entities related to others which are in time may likewise project to temporal regions.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#proper_part_of
The irreflexive variant of part-of.
[FL 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#property_of
Links properties to their bearers.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#right_boundary_of
Right boundary of a temporal region.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#role_of
The relationship between a role and its context. Typically, the nature of the context determines that of the roles, which are in some sense a part of that context. E.g., processes form the context for certain roles (processual roles), such that the latter are recognizable as processes.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#spatial_boundary_of
Spatial boundaries may bound spatial entities.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#temporal_part_of
A part-of relationship between two time entities. Time-boundaries cannot have parts.
[FL, 2008-03-13]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#time_boundary_of
Time boundaries bound temporal regions.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
IRI: http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#token_of
Inverse of the has token relations.
[FL, 2008-02-28]
This HTML document was obtained by processing the OWL ontology source code through LODE, Live OWL Documentation Environment, developed by Silvio Peroni.