http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/d489bb04-fc79-40ba-98ec-0d3ad08d4178
has affected element: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/context/deliveryContext.owl#Device
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#SpatialThing
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2006/time#TemporalEntity
has name: WARNING: the following classes do not have rdf:type owl:Class or equivalent.
type: warning

http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/c0b1210a-3897-44f4-b3f1-e5f91b3b08f9
has importance level: Minor
has affected element: http://ns.inria.fr/prissma/v1#Environment
has affected element: http://ns.inria.fr/prissma/v1#Activity
has affected element: http://ns.inria.fr/prissma/v1#Paradigm
has number affected elements: 3
has description: Ontology elements (classes, object properties and datatype properties) are created isolated, with no relation to the rest of the ontology.
has name: Creating unconnected ontology elements
has code: P04
type: pitfall

http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/8d26d220-057a-4b0f-b944-f06e409209e7
has affected element: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person
has name: Untyped class
type: pitfall
has affected element: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Organization
has description: An ontology element is used as a class without having been explicitly declared as such using the primitives owl:Class or rdfs:Class. This pitfall is related with the common problems listed in [8].
has importance level: Important
has number affected elements: 6
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#SpatialThing
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/context/deliveryContext.owl#Device
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2004/09/fresnel#Purpose
has code: P34
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2006/time#TemporalEntity

http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/73eab7c4-e4ae-4e4d-82d6-01cfad704fbe
has importance level: Important
has affected element: http://ns.inria.fr/prissma/v1#nearbyObject
has number affected elements: 1
has description: An ontology element is used as a property without having been explicitly declared as such using the primitives rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty or owl:DatatypeProperty. This pitfall is related with the common problems listed in [8].
has name: Untyped property
has code: P35
type: pitfall

http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/950a7533-173e-41b2-96f6-494c030a2654
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/context/deliveryContext.owl#Device
has affected element: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person
has name: Missing annotations
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2006/time#TemporalEntity
has affected element: http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#SpatialThing
type: pitfall
has description: This pitfall consists in creating an ontology element and failing to provide human readable annotations attached to it. Consequently, ontology elements lack annotation properties that label them (e.g. rdfs:label, lemon:LexicalEntry, skos:prefLabel or skos:altLabel) or that define them (e.g. rdfs:comment or dc:description). This pitfall is related to the guidelines provided in [5].
has number affected elements: 5
has code: P08
has affected element: http://ns.inria.fr/prissma/v1#extension
has importance level: Minor

http://oops.linkeddata.es/data/a178a751-e169-411e-b6bf-848ef9a14951
has number affected elements: 1
has importance level: Important
has description: The ontology lacks disjoint axioms between classes or between properties that should be defined as disjoint. This pitfall is related with the guidelines provided in [6], [2] and [7].
has name: Missing disjointness
has code: P10
type: pitfall