IRI:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cio.owl
Version IRI:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cio/releases/2015-03-10/cio.owl
Other visualisation:
Ontology source

Table of Content

  1. Classes
  2. Object Properties
  3. Annotation Properties
  4. Namespace Declarations

Classes

concordance of multiple evidence linesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000043

The assumption here is that assertions supported by a single evidence are less trustworthy than assertions supported by multiple evidence lines.
has super-classes
evidence concordancec
has sub-classes
conflictingc, congruentc
is disjoint with
single evidencec

confidence information elementc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000040

has sub-classes
confidence levelc, evidence concordancec, evidence type concordancec
is in range of
has confidence elementop
is disjoint with
confidence information statementc

confidence information statementc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000000

Quality and confidence are distinct concepts: quality refers to the value of a source or of an annotation, whereas confidence refers to the level of certainty that an assertion is correct.
is equivalent to
(has confidence elementop min 1 confidence information elementc) and (has confidence levelop min 0 confidence levelc) and (has evidence type concordanceop min 0 evidence type concordancec) and (has evidence concordanceop exactly 1 evidence concordancec) and (has confidence elementop max 3 confidence information elementc) and (has confidence levelop max 1 confidence levelc) and (has evidence type concordanceop max 1 evidence type concordancec)
((has evidence concordanceop only single evidencec) and (has confidence elementop min 1 confidence information elementc) and (has confidence levelop min 0 confidence levelc) and (has evidence type concordanceop exactly 0 evidence type concordancec) and (has confidence elementop max 2 confidence information elementc) and (has confidence levelop max 1 confidence levelc)) or ((has evidence concordanceop only concordance of multiple evidence linesc) and (has confidence elementop min 2 confidence information elementc) and (has confidence levelop min 0 confidence levelc) and (has evidence type concordanceop exactly 1 evidence type concordancec) and (has confidence elementop max 3 confidence information elementc) and (has confidence levelop max 1 confidence levelc))
has super-classes
has confidence levelop min 0 confidence levelc
has evidence type concordanceop max 1 evidence type concordancec
has evidence type concordanceop min 0 evidence type concordancec
has confidence elementop min 1 confidence information elementc
has confidence levelop max 1 confidence levelc
has confidence elementop max 3 confidence information elementc
has evidence concordanceop exactly 1 evidence concordancec
has sub-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence linesc, confidence statement from single evidencec
is in domain of
has confidence elementop, has evidence concordanceop
is disjoint with
confidence information elementc

confidence levelc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000028

has super-classes
confidence information elementc
has sub-classes
high confidence levelc, low confidence levelc, medium confidence levelc
is in domain of
provides greater confidence thanop
is in range of
has confidence levelop, provides greater confidence thanop
is disjoint with
evidence concordancec, evidence type concordancec

confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000009

is equivalent to
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has evidence concordanceop only conflictingc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple typesc
has evidence concordanceop only conflictingc
has sub-classes
confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc

confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000015

is equivalent to
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same typec and (has evidence concordanceop only conflictingc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same typec
has evidence concordanceop only conflictingc
has sub-classes
confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of same typec, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000008

is equivalent to
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has evidence concordanceop only congruentc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple typesc
has evidence concordanceop only congruentc
has sub-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000012

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc
has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000014

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc
has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000013

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc
has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000016

is equivalent to
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same typec and (has evidence concordanceop only congruentc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same typec
has evidence concordanceop only congruentc
has sub-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same typec

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000017

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec and (has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec
has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000018

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec and (has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec
has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc

confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000019

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec and (has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec
has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc

confidence statement from multiple evidence linesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000002

is equivalent to
confidence information statementc and (has evidence concordanceop only concordance of multiple evidence linesc) and (has evidence type concordanceop exactly 1 evidence type concordancec)
has super-classes
confidence information statementc
has evidence concordanceop only concordance of multiple evidence linesc
has evidence type concordanceop exactly 1 evidence type concordancec
has sub-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple typesc, confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same typec
is disjoint with
confidence statement from single evidencec

confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple typesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000007

is equivalent to
confidence statement from multiple evidence linesc and (has evidence type concordanceop only different typec)
has super-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence linesc
has evidence type concordanceop only different typec
has sub-classes
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple typesc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same typec

confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000006

is equivalent to
confidence statement from multiple evidence linesc and (has evidence type concordanceop only same typec)
has super-classes
confidence statement from multiple evidence linesc
has evidence type concordanceop only same typec
has sub-classes
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same typec, confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same typec
is disjoint with
confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple typesc

confidence statement from single evidencec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000001

is equivalent to
confidence information statementc and (has evidence concordanceop only single evidencec) and (has evidence type concordanceop exactly 0 evidence type concordancec)
has super-classes
confidence information statementc
has evidence type concordanceop exactly 0 evidence type concordancec
has evidence concordanceop only single evidencec
has sub-classes
high confidence from single evidencec, low confidence from single evidencec, medium confidence from single evidencec, rejectedc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from multiple evidence linesc

confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000010

is equivalent to
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has evidence concordanceop only strongly conflictingc) and (has confidence levelop exactly 0 confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc
has confidence levelop exactly 0 confidence levelc
has evidence concordanceop only strongly conflictingc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc

confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of same typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000020

is equivalent to
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same typec and (has evidence concordanceop only strongly conflictingc) and (has confidence levelop exactly 0 confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same typec
has confidence levelop exactly 0 confidence levelc
has evidence concordanceop only strongly conflictingc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000011

is equivalent to
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has evidence concordanceop only weakly conflictingc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc
has evidence concordanceop only weakly conflictingc
has sub-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000025

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc
has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000026

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc
has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence mediumc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000027

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc and (has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple typesc
has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence lowc

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000021

is equivalent to
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same typec and (has evidence concordanceop only weakly conflictingc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same typec
has evidence concordanceop only weakly conflictingc
has sub-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of same typec

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000022

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec and (has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec
has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000023

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec and (has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec
has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc

confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence mediumc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000024

Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels.
is equivalent to
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec and (has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same typec
has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc
is disjoint with
confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence highc, confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence lowc

conflictingc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000034

An assertion can have several related evidence lines, some supporting the assertion, and some rejecting the assertion (e.g., using the NOT qualifier in GO annotations).
has super-classes
concordance of multiple evidence linesc
has sub-classes
strongly conflictingc, weakly conflictingc
is disjoint with
congruentc

congruentc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000033

The assumption here is that assertions supported by a single evidence are less trustworthy than assertions supported by multiple evidence lines.
has super-classes
concordance of multiple evidence linesc
is disjoint with
conflictingc

different typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000038

has super-classes
evidence type concordancec
is disjoint with
same typec

evidence concordancec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000032

Subclasses are used to define whether there is a single evidence, or multiple evidence lines, in support of an assertion, and whether they are congruent or conflicting.
has super-classes
confidence information elementc
has sub-classes
concordance of multiple evidence linesc, single evidencec
is in range of
has evidence concordanceop
is disjoint with
confidence levelc, evidence type concordancec

evidence type concordancec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000041

The assumption here is that assertions supported by evidence lines of different experimental or computational types are more trustworthy than assertions supported by evidence lines of a same experimental or computational type.
has super-classes
confidence information elementc
has sub-classes
different typec, same typec
is in range of
has evidence type concordanceop
is disjoint with
confidence levelc, evidence concordancec

high confidence from single evidencec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000003

is equivalent to
confidence statement from single evidencec and (has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from single evidencec
has confidence levelop only high confidence levelc
is disjoint with
medium confidence from single evidencec, low confidence from single evidencec, rejectedc

high confidence levelc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000029

has super-classes
confidence levelc
provides greater confidence thanop some medium confidence levelc
is disjoint with
medium confidence levelc, low confidence levelc

low confidence from single evidencec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000005

is equivalent to
confidence statement from single evidencec and (has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from single evidencec
has confidence levelop only low confidence levelc
is disjoint with
high confidence from single evidencec, medium confidence from single evidencec, rejectedc

low confidence levelc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000031

has super-classes
confidence levelc
is disjoint with
high confidence levelc, medium confidence levelc

medium confidence from single evidencec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000004

is equivalent to
confidence statement from single evidencec and (has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc)
has super-classes
confidence statement from single evidencec
has confidence levelop only medium confidence levelc
is disjoint with
high confidence from single evidencec, low confidence from single evidencec, rejectedc

medium confidence levelc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000030

has super-classes
confidence levelc
provides greater confidence thanop some low confidence levelc
is disjoint with
high confidence levelc, low confidence levelc

rejectedc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000039

When results are retracted, associated annotations are often removed. Consequently, end-users might not be aware that the result was annotated. Annotating an assertion with this confidence term allows to keep the information available. Such assertions should not interfer with aggregation of multiple evidence lines to generate a confidence level from the branch CIO:0000002 "confidence from multiple evidence lines". This is different from negative annotations, used to negate the interpretation of an annotation. It is also different from conflicting multiple evidence lines, where each single evidence has not been directly invalidated. Rejection is a stronger assertion about an annotation source than conflict, capturing that this evidence should no longer be used.
has super-classes
confidence statement from single evidencec
is disjoint with
high confidence from single evidencec, medium confidence from single evidencec, low confidence from single evidencec

same typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000037

has super-classes
evidence type concordancec
is disjoint with
different typec

single evidencec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000042

The assumption here is that assertions supported by a single evidence are less trustworthy than assertions supported by multiple evidence lines.
has super-classes
evidence concordancec
is disjoint with
concordance of multiple evidence linesc

strongly conflictingc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000035

We distinguish two levels of conflict: weak conflict between evidence lines, e.g., a low confidence evidence negating an assertion, versus several high confidence evidence lines supporting the assertion; and strong conflict between evidence lines, e.g., two high confidence evidence lines contradicting each other. Note that strongly conflicting evidence lines are not used to produce confidence information statements associated to a confidence level (low, medium, high): in that case, the supported assertion is believed to need further validation, as evidence lines yield different conclusions of similar confidence.
has super-classes
conflictingc
is disjoint with
weakly conflictingc

weakly conflictingc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CIO_0000036

We distinguish two levels of conflict: weak conflict between evidence lines, e.g., a low confidence evidence negating an assertion, versus several high confidence evidence lines supporting the assertion; and strong conflict between evidence lines, e.g., two high confidence evidence lines contradicting each other.
has super-classes
conflictingc
is disjoint with
strongly conflictingc

Object Properties

has confidence elementop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/has_confidence_element

has sub-properties
has confidence levelop, has evidence concordanceop, has evidence type concordanceop
has domain
confidence information statementc
has range
confidence information elementc

has confidence levelop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/has_confidence_level

has super-properties
has confidence elementop
has domain
confidence information statementc and (has evidence concordanceop only not (strongly conflictingc))
has range
confidence levelc

has evidence concordanceop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/has_evidence_concordance

has super-properties
has confidence elementop
has domain
confidence information statementc
has range
evidence concordancec

has evidence type concordanceop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/has_evidence_type_concordance

has super-properties
has confidence elementop
has domain
confidence information statementc and (has evidence concordanceop only concordance of multiple evidence linesc)
has range
evidence type concordancec

provides greater confidence thanop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/provides_greater_confidence_than

has characteristics: transitive

has domain
confidence levelc
has range
confidence levelc

Annotation Properties

bgee not trustedap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cio/#bgee_not_trusted

Terms that are considered not trusted by the Bgee team, related to assertions needing additional support.
has super-properties
subset_propertyap

commentap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment

database_cross_referenceap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#hasDbXref

definitionap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115

has related synonymap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#hasRelatedSynonym

has_exact_synonymap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#hasExactSynonym

has_obo_format_versionap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#hasOBOFormatVersion

idap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#id

in_subsetap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#inSubset

labelap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label

shorthandap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#shorthand

subset_propertyap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#SubsetProperty

has sub-properties
bgee not trustedap

Namespace Declarations back to ToC

default namespace
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cio.owl#
2015-03-10
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cio/releases/2015-03-10/
cio
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cio/#
obo
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/
oboInOwl
http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#
owl
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
rdf
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfs
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
xsd
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

This HTML document was obtained by processing the OWL ontology source code through LODE, Live OWL Documentation Environment, developed by Silvio Peroni.