INTRO – the intertextual, interpictorial, and intermedial relations ontology

IRI:
https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408
Date :
01/08/2024
Current version :
BETA 202408 - Subclasses are subject to refinement and addition; provisional state indicated by "INT"-IRIs/Labels without number.
Previous version :
https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202304 (visualise it with LODE )
Authors :
Bernhard Oberreither
https://d-nb.info/gnd/1036708799
Other visualisation :
Ontology source - WebVowl
This ontology is distributed under the creative commons attribution 4.0 international licence (CC-BY 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Changes from version beta202304 to version beta202408: Expanded to an Intertextual, Interpictorial, and Intermedial Relations Ontology - Changed class INT3 Intertextual Relationship to INT3 Interrelation with subclasses intertextual, intermedial, and interpictorial relation (INT31-33). - Renamed class INT4 ReceptionalEntity to INT4 Feature. - Added INT23 Visual Feature and INT24 Textual Feature as subclasses of INT4 Feature. - Drastically decluttered INT10 Formal Feature. - Added subclass INT Textual Genre Specifics and INT Visual Genre Specifics to INT Genre Specifics; previous direct subclasses INT Dramatic Entity, INT Lyrical Entity, and INT Narratological Entity are now subclasses of INT Textual Genre Specifics. - Decluttered INT Pragmatic Feature, added subclass INT18 Reference. - Added INT Identification and INT Situation as subclasses of INT9 Semantic Feature. - Renamed INT6 Architextual Entity to INT6 Architext. Reduced subclasses. - Renamed INT11 Type of Intertextual Relationship to INT11 Type of Interrelation. - Renamed subclasses of INT11 Type of Interrelation, added subclasses INT34 Intermediality in Intermediality Theories and INT35 Interpictoriality in Interpictoriality Theories. - Renamed INT1 Text Passage to INT1 Passage; changed superclass from F2 Expression to E90 Symbolic Object. - Added INT21 Text Passage and INT22 Image Area as subclasses of INT1 Passage. Changed object property R10 has Text Passage to R10 has Passage, added subproperties R30 has text passage and R31 has image area. - Changed property domains/ranges accordingly. - Renamed INT Interpretament to INT Interpretation. - Changed R9 has preceding interpretament and inverse to R9 hasPrecedingActualization and R9 hasSubsequentActualization, changed domain/range to INT2 Actualization of Feature. Web Annotation Ontology Alignment: - Added skos:broadMatch to Properties R24 has related entity and R41 has location. - Added skos:broadMatch to Classes INT1 Passage, INT3 Interrelation, INT16 Segment, INT21 TextPassage, and INT22 Image Area. LRMoo Alignment: - Changed former FRBRoo classes F1 Work, F2 Expression, F22 Self-Contained Expression and F24 Publication Expression to LRMoo F1 Work, F2 Expression, and F3 Manifestation (according to mapping in LRMoo's documentation under https://cidoc-crm.org/lrmoo/sites/default/files/LRMoo_V1.0.pdf).

Table of Content

  1. Introduction
  2. Classes
  3. Object Properties
  4. Data Properties
  5. Named Individuals
  6. Annotation Properties
  7. Namespace Declarations

Introduction

INTRO is an ontology for the fields of literary studies, art studies and intermediality studies for the representation of intertextual, interpictorial, and intermedial relations. It enables the presentation and categorization of diverse features of both textual and pictorial origin and their linking. Its subject area includes the scholarly discourse on these texts/images, interrelations, and features, insofar as research results are also understood as texts with features and relations. The notions of 'text' and 'image' in this ontology are largely derived from their use in the ontologies INTRO is an extension of. For definitions, see the passages in the documentations of CIDOC crm resp. LRM on the relevant classes (these being CIDOC crm's E73 Information Object, and E90 Symbolic Object resp. LRM's F1 Work, F2 Expression, F3 Manifestation). Depending on the theoretical framework, the notion of 'text' can be understood very broadly: It can include images, it can cover large corpora of texts otherwise understood as distinct entities. INTRO makes use of these possibilities in the regard of including the notion of 'Architexts' as introduced by Gérard Genette as sets of texts (and in this case images) seen as a unit (by reference to certain features, timeframes, semantic features etc., see INT6 Architext). One differentiation INTRO is built on is the one between a 'passage' and a 'segment'. These two concepts are parallel to LRM's F2 Expression/CIDOC CRM's E36 Visual Item on the one hand and LRM's F3 Manifestation on the other hand, in the way that the former (Expression/Visual Item, Passage) embody a more abstract concept of the text/image and of its parts, while the latter (Manifestation, Segment) refer to the form a text/an image and its parts take when they are manifested in a specific way or version, e.g. at the stage of a certain published edition. Examples include a passage from Goethe's "Faust", Act V, vs. a passage from Act V. of a specific edition of Goethe's "Faust". Only the latter one is a citable entity in the sense that it has a place and a date of publication, a publisher, and a page number attached to it; the former can be manifested in many of the latter. These differentiations suffice for an outside view of expressions / manifestations and their parts. When confronted with expression form and contents and the like – here combined in the notion of 'feature' –, another level comes into play. A basic orientation can be obtained from Edmund Husserl's notion of image, respectively his separation of the image ("Bild") from its carrier ("Bildding") and its content ("Bildsujet") as discussed in "Phantasie und Bildbewusstsein" (1904/1905; parallel and clarified nomenclature can be found e.g. in Wolfram Pichler's and Ralph Ubl's "Bildtheorie zur Einführung", 2014, where the three notions are called – my translation – image vehicle, image object, and image referent; for further examples of this trias in image theory and semiotics, see Simon 2009, p. 41). While Husserl's carrier combines the F4 Item and the F3 Manifestation of an image (which, with regard to paintings, can easily fall together – as painting is, now following Nelson Goodman, an 'autographic' art) and the image itself corresponds to the F2 Expression resp. CIDOC CRM's E36 Visual Item, all the features an image can actualize belong in his third category ("Bildsujet"). This third category – the question of what is 'in' an image or text, what can be 'seen on' resp. 'read out' of it, etc. – is provided by the interaction of two classes of INTRO: The INT4 Feature and the INT2 Actualization of Feature. The 'feature' is the more abstract concept separate from the specific text/image. One and the same feature (e.g. chiaroscuro painting, a hero character, a plotline, etc.) can be identified in multiple texts/images, while the specific actualization of the feature is bound to the respective text/image. An image can have one or many carriers, and many images can refer to the same real-life entity. (Rooting a single image in different versions of, e.g., a work of art, or in a series of works of art however touches upon a grey area between the terms "image" and "sujet"). This trias of an expression's manifestation, the expression itself, and its 'contents' (as actualized features) is again expanded by the question of referentiality. Ralf Simon (2009, p. 48f.) introduces a fourth instance to the original trias, differentiating between the carrier, the image, the image object and the referent, the latter two dividing what was formerly one entity referred to as, e. g., sujet. This states a difference between a (usually: semantic) actualized feature and a possible, but not necessary reference to an external entity. This modelling is well inside INTRO's scope: The ontology makes use of a very basic notion of referentiality with regard to images as well as texts. Actualized features can themselves refer to a real-world entity and by doing so be actualizations of the feature INT18 Reference; actualizations of all kinds of features can carry actualizations of the feature reference. (Note that this construction offers a quite simple answer to the question if the reference to a fictitious entity – e. g., a unicorn – is possible resp. a reference at all: The unicorn is, in this case, a semantic feature, not a referred-to real-world entity.) Throughout the ontology, the term 'relation' is to be understood in the broadest sense. The ontology instantiates relations between (textual, pictorial) entities or features thereof; while it does not pose any restrictions on the notion of 'relation', it provides subclasses for expressing the medial aspect (intertextual, interpictorial, intermedial) as well as classes for further specification. The ontology also provides the opportunity to link these specifications (as well as many other of its concepts) to the scholarly discourse they are the subject of. This way, INTRO covers a large portion of scholarly practice; some of the subclasses of INT9 Semantic Feature in combination with object properties linking these features also allow - to some degree - for the reconstruction of the argumentative structure of, e.g., research papers (as they allow for the reconstruction of the contents of literary works). References: Trond Aalberg, Pat Riva, Maja Žumer (2024, maintainers), LRMOO. Object-oriented definition and mapping from the IFLA Library Reference Model. Version 1.0. URL: https://cidoc-crm.org/lrmoo/sites/default/files/LRMoo_V1.0.pdf Chryssoula Bekiari et al. (eds., 2024), Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Version 7.1.3. URL: https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/cidoc_crm_version_7.1.3.pdf Nelson Goodman (1976), Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. 2nd edition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Edmund Husserl (1980 [1904/1905]), Phantasie und Bildbewusstsein. In: Eduard Marbach (ed.), Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898-1925). Den Haag, Boston u. London: Martinus Nijhoff (= Husserliana. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 23), pp. 1-169. Wolfram Pichler, Ralph Ubl (2014), Bildtheorie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Ralf Simon (2009), Der poetische Text als Bildkritik. München: Wilhelm Fink.

Classes

f2 expressionc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/F2_Expression

has super-classes
e73 information objectc
has members
INTROni, INTRO beta202001ni, INTRO beta202210ni, INTRO beta202304ni

f3 manifestationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/F3_Manifestation

has super-classes
e73 information objectc
is in domain of
R25 has segmentop
is in range of
R25i is segment ofop

INT Act (Drama)c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Act

has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Partc

INT Atmospherec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Atmosphere

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Chapter (Prose)c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Chapter

has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Partc

INT Characterc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Character

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Individual Characterc, INT Type of Characterc

INT Compositionc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Composition

has super-classes
INT10 Formal Featurec

INT Constellationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Constellation

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec
is in domain of
R3 constellatesop
is in range of
R3i is constellated byop

INT Definitionc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Definition

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec
INT Pragmatic Featurec

INT Descriptionc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Description

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec
INT Pragmatic Featurec

INT Disciplinec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Discipline

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Discoursec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Discourse

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Dramatic Entityc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_DramaticEntity

This class comprises concepts from drama theory.
has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Textual Genre Specificsc

INT Epochc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Epoch

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Eventc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Event

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Figurative Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_FigurativeFeature

The class comprises figures of speech. Since there are countless classification systems (the most common dividing figures into tropoi - metaphor, metonymy ... - and schemata/figurae, further dividing the latter into figures of thougth and figures of word, further dividing the latter into grammatical and rhetorical figures of word), no subclasses will be provided.
has super-classes
INT8 Rhetorical Featurec

INT Figurative Meaningc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_FigurativeMeaning

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Genrec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Genre

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Genre Specificsc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_GenreSpecifics

INT Genre Specifics comprises all features that are used to assign a certain genre - whether textual or visual -, are typical of such a genre, or occur frequently in it. Instances might often be also instances of the other subclasses of INT4 Feature. INT Genre Specifics' two subclasses – INT Visual Genre Specifics and INT Textual Genre Specifics – do not imply that each feature must be either–or, in some cases features will be assignable to both classes.
has super-classes
INT8 Rhetorical Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Textual Genre Specificsc, INT Visual Genre Specificsc

INT Geographically Defined Architextc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_SpaciallyDefinedArchitext

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Identificationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Identification

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Individual Characterc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_IndividualCharacter

has super-classes
INT Characterc

INT Individual Objectc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_IndividualObject

has super-classes
INT Objectc

INT Individual Placec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_IndividualPlace

has super-classes
INT Placec

INT Interpretationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Interpretation

The result of a interpretative act, possibly: as perceived in research literature. An interpretation can identify references or actualizations or the like. A number of interpretations can together recreate the structure of, e.g., a research paper. Accordingly, apart from linking INT Interpretations to the subjects of the interpretation, like intertextual relations or textual features, they can be linked to each other via R9 has subsequent feature resp. R9i has preceding feature. Examples: - the statement that Umberto Eco's 'The Name of the Rose' features a detective character. - the statement that Umberto Eco's 'The Name of the Rose' contains references to Arthur Conan Doyle's 'Sherlock Holmes'. - the statement that Umberto Eco's 'The Name of the Rose' is set in the 14th century. - the conclusion that Umberto Eco's 'The Name of the Rose' belongs to the genre 'postmodern crime novel'.
has super-classes
e89 propositional objectc
INT9 Semantic Featurec
INT Pragmatic Featurec
is in domain of
R20 discussesop, R21 identifiesop
is in range of
R20i is discussed inop, R21i is identified byop

INT Line (Poetry)c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Line

has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Partc

INT Lyrical Entityc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_LyricalEntity

This class comprises rhetorical concepts from lyric theory.
has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Textual Genre Specificsc

INT Moodc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Mood

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Motifc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Motif

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Movementc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Movement

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Narratological Entityc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_NarratologicalEntity

This class comprises narratological concepts insofar as they correlate with rhetorical concepts (like 'speech', 'distance', 'perspective' etc.). Due to the plurality of narratological frameworks, no subclasses will be provided at this point.
has super-classes
INT Textual Genre Specificsc

INT Objectc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Object

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Individual Objectc, INT Typical Objectc

INT Oeuvrec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Oeuvre

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Opinionc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Opinion

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec
is in domain of
R8 has opinion objectop
is in range of
R8i is opinion object ofop

INT Paragraph (Prose)c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Paragraph

has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Partc

INT Partc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Part

has super-classes
INT10 Formal Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Act (Drama)c, INT Chapter (Prose)c, INT Line (Poetry)c, INT Paragraph (Prose)c, INT Scene (Drama)c, INT Tableau (Drama)c, INT Verse (Poetry)c

INT Placec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Place

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Individual Placec, INT Type of Placec

INT Plotc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Plot

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Pragmatic Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_PragmaticFeature

The class includes all features that can be attributed to a text or image with regard to the role that these works play in a plot, for example in a social, political or religious context. These characteristics take account of the fact that the works in question pursue a specific purpose that goes beyond content and form and that is apparent 'on the surface‘ or by application of certain conventions or handed-down standards. While INTRO-subclasses of this class are limited to those close to the functionality of INTRO and which are to be applied to the relation between primary and secondary (textual) sources, subclasses can of course also include concepts from visual art. A pragmatic feature of a painting might be a donor portrait expressing gratitude, the portrait of a ruler serving propaganda purposes, a bible scene serving as guide for pious action. Pragmatic features of texts include bibliographic references, acknowledgments, and the like.
has super-classes
INT8 Rhetorical Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Definitionc, INT Descriptionc, INT Interpretationc, INT18 Referencec

INT Scene (Drama)c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Scene

has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Partc

INT Schoolc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_School

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Situationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Situation

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Statec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_State

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Subjectc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Subject

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Subtextc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Subtext

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Tableau (Drama)c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Tableau

has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Partc

INT Temporally Defined Architextc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_TemporallyDefinedArchitext

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Text Typec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_TextType

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Textual Genre Specificsc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_TextualGenreSpecifics

has super-classes
INT Genre Specificsc
has sub-classes
INT Dramatic Entityc, INT Lyrical Entityc, INT Narratological Entityc

INT Themec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Theme

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Theoryc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Theory

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Timespanc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_TimeSpan

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Topicc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Topic

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Toposc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Topos

has super-classes
INT9 Semantic Featurec

INT Type of Characterc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_TypeOfCharacter

has super-classes
INT Characterc

INT Type of Placec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_TypeOfPlace

has super-classes
INT Placec

INT Typical Objectc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_TypicalObject

has super-classes
INT Objectc

INT Variety of Textc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_VarietyOfText

has super-classes
INT6 Architextc

INT Verse (Poetry)c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_Verse

has super-classes
INT24 Textual Featurec
INT Partc

INT Visual Genre Specificsc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT_VisualGenreSpecifics

has super-classes
INT Genre Specificsc

INT1 Passagec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT1_Passage

The INT1 Passage is a means of modelling an identifiable part of an E73 Information Object or its subclasses – without that part being removed from its source Information Object. For examples, see subclass comments. The skos:broadMatch states that the INT1 Passage can be regarded as an oa:SpecificResource in the sense that it is a section of a resource. The skos:broadMatch between R41 hasLocation and oa:hasSelector indicates that by replacing R41 hasLocation with oa:hasSelector, multiple selector options from the Web Annotation Ontology can be utilized to specify the INT1 Passage's location.
has super-classes
e90 symbolic objectc
has sub-classes
INT21 Text Passagec, INT22 Image Areac
is in domain of
R10i is passage ofop
is in range of
R10 has passageop

INT10 Formal Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT10_FormalFeature

This class comprises subclasses for every formal aspect of a text or image. It is divided into the subclasses INT Part and INT Composition, the former containing elements possibly structured according to the latter. Instances or subclasses of these two classes are likely also instances / subclasses of other subclasses of INT4 Feature: An INT Part can at the same time be an INT Object (formal and semantic) or an INT Dramatic Entity (formal and rhetorical); questions of perspective and vanishing point can be considered in a formal as well as a rhetorical respect. As a consequence of the ontology's origin, INT Part is currently dominated by literary terms which makes the addition of custom subclasses for pictorial features necessary.
has super-classes
INT4 Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Compositionc, INT Partc

INT11 Type of Interrelationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT11_TypeOfInterrelation

This class comprises (as subclasses) the many classifications of interrelations between instances of texts of images (on any ontological level) that are identified, for example, in research literature, but also in greek rhetoric, in genre theory and so on.
has super-classes
e55 typec
has sub-classes
INT12 Common Interrelation Typesc, INT13 Interrelation in Genre Theoryc, INT14 Interrelation in Rhetoricc, INT15 Intertextuality in Intertextuality Theoriesc, INT17 Functional Relationc, INT34 Intermediality in Intermediality Theoriesc, INT35 Interpictoriality in Interpictoriality Theoriesc
is in domain of
R19i is type ofop
is in range of
R19 has typeop

INT12 Common Interrelation Typesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT12_CommonInterrelationTypes

This class comprises common concepts of interrelations such as 'citation', 'plagiarism', 'allusion' and so on; no further definition is necessary.
has super-classes
INT11 Type of Interrelationc

INT13 Interrelation in Genre Theoryc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT13_InterrelationInGenreTheory

This class comprises types of interrelations that are defined or applied in genre theory.
has super-classes
INT11 Type of Interrelationc

INT14 Interrelation in Rhetoricc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT14_InterrelationInRhetoric

This class comprises interrelations (likely: mostly intertextual relations) that are defined in works on rhetoric.
has super-classes
INT11 Type of Interrelationc

INT15 Intertextuality in Intertextuality Theoriesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT15_IntertextualityInIntTheories

This class comprises intertextual relationships that are defined or applied in research literature dedicated to intertextuality theory.
has super-classes
INT11 Type of Interrelationc

INT16 Segmentc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT16_Segment

This class comprises expressions (e.g. texts represented as F2 Expressions) or parts thereof as they are represented in F3 Manifestations. INT16 Segments can be located inside the F3 Manifestation by means of page numbers etc. and are thus identifiable (and citable). They are not identical to/subclasses of F3 Manifestations, since they only make a part of it; they are not identical to F2 Expressions, since they have distinct metadata linking them to, e. g., a certain edition of a work. The INT16 Segment can be linked to an F2 Expression (resp. a E36 Visual Item) or an INT1 Passage through R16 incorporates. It can be linked to a physical carrier (like LRMs "F5_Item") through P128 is carried by.
has super-classes
e90 symbolic objectc
is in domain of
R16 incorporatesop, R25i is segment ofop
is in range of
R16i is incorporated inop, R25 has segmentop

INT17 Functional Relationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT17_FunctionalRelation

This class comprises types of interrelations between a text or an image on any ontological level and an architext that have merely classificatory or typological function, including a text/an image being a part of an architext (an epoch, a movement etc.), its initial or final text/image, etc.
has super-classes
INT11 Type of Interrelationc

INT18 Referencec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT18_Reference

This class comprises references to – usually: real – identifiable objects of any kind. It is not restricted to non-fictional texts resp. images depicting real life objects or events, but can be most easily applied there. The CIDOC CRM property P67 refers to is recommended to establish the link to the entity referred to. However, there are two options: P67 can link this INT18 Reference (or any other feature) to the external entity, but it can also link the corresponding actualization of said feature to the external entity. This depends on the respective theoretical framework and is not specified in the context of this ontology. (The scope of this class also includes references to other images/texts, if one wants to model an interrelation this way.)
has super-classes
e89 propositional objectc
INT9 Semantic Featurec
INT Pragmatic Featurec

INT2 Actualization of Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT2_ActualizationOfFeature

The fact that a text or an image shows - in its own specific way - a certain feature (which itself is an abstract concept and takes form in many texts/images), e.g. a motif, an atmosphere, a theme, a figure of speech. Examples: - the specific actualization of the motif of patricide in Sophokles' 'Ödipus Rex'. - the specific actualization of the Faust-subject in Goethe's 'Faust'. - the specific actualization of the iambic pentameter in Rilke's 'Archaischer Torso Apollos". - the specific actualization of the Ophelia-character in John Everett Millais' painting "Ophelia" (1852).
has super-classes
e28 conceptual objectc
is in domain of
R17 actualizes featureop, R18i actualization found onop, R3i is constellated byop, R4 definesop, R9 has subsequent actualizationop, R9i has preceding actualizationop
is in range of
R17i feature actualized inop, R18 shows actualizationop, R3 constellatesop, R4i is defined inop, R9 has subsequent actualizationop, R9i has preceding actualizationop

INT21 Text Passagec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT21_TextPassage

The INT21 TextPassage is a means of modelling an identifiable part of an E73 Information Object or its subclasses – without that part being removed from its source Information Object. Examples: - The words 'Abandon all hope ye who enter here' from Canto III of Dante's Inferno. - The first four lines of Rilke's poem "Archaischer Torso Apollos" - The last item on a shopping list. The skos:broadMatch states that the INT21 TextPassage can be regarded as an oa:SpecificResource in the sense that it is a section of a resource. The skos:broadMatch between R41 hasLocation and oa:hasSelector indicates that by replacing R41 hasLocation with oa:hasSelector, multiple selector options from the Web Annotation Ontology can be utilized to specify the INT21 TextPassage's location.
has super-classes
INT1 Passagec
is in domain of
R30i is text passage ofop
is in range of
R30 has text passageop

INT22 Image Areac back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT22_ImageArea

The INT22 ImageArea is a means of modelling an identifiable part of an image (itself modelled as an E73 Information Object or one of its subclasses) – without that part being removed from its source Information Object. Examples: - The part of Leonardo's Mona Lisa showing Mona Lisa's smile. - The bottom 3/5 of Rothko's Painting "Orange And Yellow" (1956), dominated by the fuzzy orange rectangle. - The part of the "Smiley Face" originally invented by Harvey Ball that shows the Smiley's left eye. - The part of Piranesi's The Drawbridge, 2nd version, showing a drawbridge. The skos:broadMatch states that the INT22 ImageArea can be regarded as an oa:SpecificResource in the sense that it is a section of a resource. The skos:broadMatch between R41 hasLocation and oa:hasSelector indicates that by replacing R41 hasLocation with oa:hasSelector, multiple selector options from the Web Annotation Ontology can be utilized to specify the INT22 ImageArea's location.
has super-classes
INT1 Passagec
is in domain of
R31i is image area ofop
is in range of
R31 has image areaop

INT23 Visual Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT23_VisualFeature

This class contains visual features of images - but possibly also of texts. Its subclasses are rudimentary, it is very likely that instances of other INT4 Feature subclasses can be classified as visual features at the same time. This might be the case for, e.g., INT Composition (although for these instances classification as an INT26 Shape should also be considered).
has super-classes
INT4 Featurec
has sub-classes
INT25 Colorc, INT26 Shapec, INT27 Texturec, INT28 Ratioc

INT24 Textual Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT24_TextualFeature

This class contains textual features, usually found on texts - but possibly also on images. It is very likely that instances of other INT4 Feature subclasses can be classified as textual features at the same time.
has super-classes
INT4 Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Act (Drama)c, INT Chapter (Prose)c, INT Dramatic Entityc, INT Line (Poetry)c, INT Lyrical Entityc, INT Paragraph (Prose)c, INT Scene (Drama)c, INT Tableau (Drama)c, INT Verse (Poetry)c

INT25 Colorc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT25_Color

has super-classes
INT23 Visual Featurec

INT26 Shapec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT26_Shape

has super-classes
INT23 Visual Featurec

INT27 Texturec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT27_Texture

has super-classes
INT23 Visual Featurec

INT28 Ratioc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT28_Ratio

has super-classes
INT23 Visual Featurec

INT3 Interrelationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT3_Interrelation

This class comprises the abstract notion of a relationship between texts and/or images resp. their parts as it is identified by a recipient (which is not the same as the rhetorical entity 'quotation'). Every INT3 Interrelation has at least 2 related entities, which are texts/images (on any ontological level) or INT2 Actualizations of Features. An INT3 Interrelation is possibly identified in an INT Interpretation and further defined by an INT11 TypeOfInterrelation. The skos:broadMatch to oa:Annotation indicates that stating the existence of an intertextual relation can be seen as a kind of annotation made to resources, in this case: at least two, the related entities (texts and/or images).
has super-classes
e28 conceptual objectc
has sub-classes
INT31 Intertextual Relationc, INT32 Interpictorial Relationc, INT33 Intermedial Relationc
is in domain of
R12 has referred to entityop, R13 has referring entityop, R19 has typeop, R22i relation is based on similarityop, R24 has related entityop
is in range of
R12i is referred to entityop, R13i is referring entityop, R19i is type ofop, R22 provides similarity for relationop, R24i is related entityop

INT31 Intertextual Relationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT31_IntertextualRelation

has super-classes
INT3 Interrelationc

INT32 Interpictorial Relationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT32_InterpictorialRelation

has super-classes
INT3 Interrelationc

INT33 Intermedial Relationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT33_IntermedialRelation

has super-classes
INT3 Interrelationc

INT34 Intermediality in Intermediality Theoriesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT34_IntermedialityInIntermedialityTheories

This class comprises intermedial relations that can be found in research literature dedicated to intermediality theory.
has super-classes
INT11 Type of Interrelationc

INT35 Interpictoriality in Interpictoriality Theoriesc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT35_InterpictorialityInInterpictorialityTheories

This class comprises interpictorial relations that can be found in research literature dedicated to interpictoriality theory.
has super-classes
INT11 Type of Interrelationc

INT4 Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT4_Feature

This class comprises features that 'are in' or 'can be found in' or 'can be read out of' a text or an image. INT2 Actualizations of these features are the results of a receptive process that identifies the specific form the INT4 Feature – a distinct abstract concept, itself separate from the text or image – takes in the text or image. This class therefore has a wide scope. Its domain could be divided into subclasses following any number of different ratios; to avoid the resulting restrictions and/or complex hierarchies, the actual subclasses of the INT4 Feature represent diverse approaches to its subject matter, covering medial aspects as well as aspect of form and semantics. They can be populated resp. extended with custom subclasses based e.g. on relevant reference works: The class INT8 Rhetorical Feature could contain concepts based on classical rhetoric like allegory or personification, but would of course also include the pictorial pendants of these tropes. Lemmata from handbooks of poetic terms as well as concepts of pictorial composition could populate the INT10 Formal Feature resp. its (sub-)subclasses. Subclasses of INT9 Semantic Feature could be extended using art thesauri as well as handbooks on literary motives. For external thesauri and vocabularies see, e. g., ICONCLASS, the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus, the Getty Cultural Objects Name Authority, the Getty Union List of Artist Names, the Literary Theme Ontology (LTO), the Document Components Ontology, the OntoPoetry Ontology, the Taxonomy of Themes and Motifs (TTM2) ...
has super-classes
e28 conceptual objectc
has sub-classes
INT10 Formal Featurec, INT23 Visual Featurec, INT24 Textual Featurec, INT8 Rhetorical Featurec, INT9 Semantic Featurec
is in domain of
R17i feature actualized inop, R22 provides similarity for relationop, R43 has specificationdp
is in range of
R17 actualizes featureop, R22i relation is based on similarityop

INT6 Architextc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT6_Architext

An INT6 Architextual Entity consists in a number of texts/images which in some way give reason to see them as connected, related, sharing a common feature. Examples for INT6 Architextual Entities can be - discourses (members sharing a discoursive element, a topic etc.) - genres (members sharing genre conventions) - a discipline (members deriving from the same disciplinary background) - an oeuvre (members created by the same person) - national literatures/arts (members whose creators share a nationality) etc.
has super-classes
e28 conceptual objectc
has sub-classes
INT Disciplinec, INT Discoursec, INT Epochc, INT Genrec, INT Geographically Defined Architextc, INT Movementc, INT Oeuvrec, INT Schoolc, INT Temporally Defined Architextc, INT Text Typec, INT Variety of Textc

INT8 Rhetorical Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT8_RhetoricalFeature

This class comprises every aspect of a text or an image that can be described in terms of rhetorics, meaning its "How?" and "To what end?". This includes features ranging from the occurrence of rhetorical tropes to aspects of composition in visual arts to aspects of the narrative act such as 'voice' or 'narrating time' (figurative or narratological entities, covering the "How") to parts of an e.g. research paper like 'introduction' or 'quotation', or, for example, the donor portrait in an altar piece (covering pragmatic aspects, the "To what end").
has super-classes
INT4 Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Figurative Featurec, INT Genre Specificsc, INT Pragmatic Featurec

INT9 Semantic Featurec back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#INT9_SemanticFeature

This class comprises every semantic aspect of a text or image, like the common notions of 'plot', 'sujet', or 'character'. While most subclasses are still object to refinement and addition – to indicate their provisional status they are not yet numbered in this version of INTRO –, INT18 Reference has been numbered to indicate its consolidated status.
has super-classes
INT4 Featurec
has sub-classes
INT Atmospherec, INT Characterc, INT Constellationc, INT Definitionc, INT Descriptionc, INT Eventc, INT Figurative Meaningc, INT Identificationc, INT Interpretationc, INT Moodc, INT Motifc, INT Objectc, INT Opinionc, INT Placec, INT Plotc, INT Situationc, INT Statec, INT Subjectc, INT Subtextc, INT Themec, INT Theoryc, INT Timespanc, INT Topicc, INT Toposc, INT18 Referencec

Object Properties

R10 has passageop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R10_hasPassage

Links a text or an image – usually: a work or an expression – to an INT1 Passage from that text or image, e.g. a book to a passage on page three of this book, or a painting to an area on this paining.

has characteristics : transitive

has sub-properties
R30 has text passageop, R31 has image areaop
has domain
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
has range
INT1 Passagec
is inverse of
R10i is passage ofop

R10i is passage ofop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R10i_isPassageOf

has characteristics : transitive

has sub-properties
R30i is text passage ofop, R31i is image area ofop
has domain
INT1 Passagec
has range
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
is inverse of
R10 has passageop

R12 has referred to entityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R12_hasReferredToEntity

Links an INT3 Interrelation to the entity referred to in the relationship (a text or image on any ontological level or a feature actualized in the text resp. image in question).
has super-properties
R24 has related entityop
has domain
INT3 Interrelationc
has range
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
is inverse of
R12i is referred to entityop

R12i is referred to entityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R12i_isReferredToEntity

has super-properties
R24i is related entityop
has domain
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
has range
INT3 Interrelationc
is inverse of
R12 has referred to entityop

R13 has referring entityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R13_hasReferringEntity

Links an INT3 Interrelation to a referring entity (a text or image on any ontological level or a feature actualized in the text resp. image in question).
has super-properties
R24 has related entityop
has domain
INT3 Interrelationc
has range
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
is inverse of
R13i is referring entityop

R13i is referring entityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R13i_isReferringEntity

has super-properties
R24i is related entityop
has domain
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
has range
INT3 Interrelationc
is inverse of
R13 has referring entityop

R16 incorporatesop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R16_incorporates

Links an INT16 Segment to the text or image on any ontological level (passage, expression, work) it incorporates.
has domain
INT16 Segmentc
has range
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
is inverse of
R16i is incorporated inop

R16i is incorporated inop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R16i_isIncorporatedIn

has domain
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
has range
INT16 Segmentc
is inverse of
R16 incorporatesop

R17 actualizes featureop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R17_actualizesFeature

Links the specific INT2 Actualization of Feature to the (abstract concept of the) feature it actualizes, an INT4 Feature.
has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
has range
INT4 Featurec
is inverse of
R17i feature actualized inop

R17i feature actualized inop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R17i_featureActualizedIn

has domain
INT4 Featurec
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
is inverse of
R17 actualizes featureop

R18 shows actualizationop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R18_showsActualization

Links a text or an image (on any ontological level) or an INT2 Actualization of Feature to an INT2 Actualization of Feature found on it. (Actualizations found on actualizations - this occurs in cases where, e.g., the actualization of the feature INT Individual Character can be read as the actualization of the feature INT Character Type or INT18 Reference.)
has domain
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
is inverse of
R18i actualization found onop

R18i actualization found onop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R18i_actualizationFoundOn

has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
has range
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
is inverse of
R18 shows actualizationop

R19 has typeop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R19_hasType

Links an INT3 Interrelation to its INT11 Type of Interrelation.
has super-properties
p2 has typeop
has domain
INT3 Interrelationc
has range
INT11 Type of Interrelationc
is inverse of
R19i is type ofop

R19i is type ofop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R19i_isTypeOf

has super-properties
p2i is type ofop
has domain
INT11 Type of Interrelationc
has range
INT3 Interrelationc
is inverse of
R19 has typeop

R20 discussesop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R20_discusses

Links an INT Interpretation to the instance of text or image (on any ontological level) it discusses.
has super-properties
p67 refers toop
has domain
INT Interpretationc
has range
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT6 Architextc
is inverse of
R20i is discussed inop

R20i is discussed inop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R20i_isDiscussedIn

has super-properties
p67i is referred to byop
has domain
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT6 Architextc
has range
INT Interpretationc
is inverse of
R20 discussesop

R21 identifiesop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R21_identifies

Links an INT Identification or INT Interpretation to the INT3 Interrelation or the INT2 Actualization of Feature it identifies.
has super-properties
p67 refers toop
has domain
INT Interpretationc
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT3 Interrelationc
is inverse of
R21i is identified byop

R21i is identified byop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R21i_isIdentifiedBy

has super-properties
p67i is referred to byop
has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT3 Interrelationc
has range
INT Interpretationc
is inverse of
R21 identifiesop

R22 provides similarity for relationop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R22_providesSimilarityForRelation

Links an INT4 Feature to an INT3 Interrelation it provides the similarity for, the similarity being necessary for the detection of the INT3 Interrelation. States that an INT3 Interrelation is based on a similarity, i.e. the actualization of the same INT4 Feature in two different texts/images.
has domain
INT4 Featurec
has range
INT3 Interrelationc
is inverse of
R22i relation is based on similarityop

R22i relation is based on similarityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R22i_relationIsBasedOnSimilarity

has domain
INT3 Interrelationc
has range
INT4 Featurec
is inverse of
R22 provides similarity for relationop

R23 provides support forop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R23_providesSupportFor

Relates a source (a text on any ontological level or an actualization of a feature on said source) to the outcome of a receptional or interpretative act (an INT2 Actualization of Feature, an INT4 Feature like an INT Interpretation, an INT3 Interrelation) to support it.
has domain
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT3 Interrelationc or INT4 Featurec
is inverse of
R23i support provided byop

R23i support provided byop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R23i_supportProvidedBy

has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT3 Interrelationc or INT4 Featurec
has range
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
is inverse of
R23 provides support forop

R24 has related entityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R24_hasRelatedEntity

Links any INT3 Interrelation to a text or image (on any ontological level) or INT2 Actualization of Feature that is part of the INT3 Interrelation. The skos:broadMatch states that this property is a more specific version of oa:hasTarget in the sense that the INT3 Interrelation can be seen as an annotation, the texts/images linked by this relationship as their targets.
has sub-properties
R12 has referred to entityop, R13 has referring entityop
has domain
INT3 Interrelationc
has range
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
is inverse of
R24i is related entityop

R24i is related entityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R24i_isRelatedEntity

has sub-properties
R12i is referred to entityop, R13i is referring entityop
has domain
f1 workc or e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec or INT2 Actualization of Featurec or INT6 Architextc
has range
INT3 Interrelationc
is inverse of
R24 has related entityop

R25 has segmentop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R25_hasSegment

Links a F3 Manifestation to an INT16 Segment it contains (the segment in turn R16 incorporates an INT1 Passage or an F2 Expression).
has domain
f3 manifestationc
has range
INT16 Segmentc
is inverse of
R25i is segment ofop

R25i is segment ofop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R25i_isSegmentOf

has domain
INT16 Segmentc
has range
f3 manifestationc
is inverse of
R25 has segmentop

R3 constellatesop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R3_constellates

Links an INT Constellation to the elements (INT2 Actualizations of Feature) that together form that INT Constellation.
has domain
INT Constellationc
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
is inverse of
R3i is constellated byop

R30 has text passageop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R30_hasTextPassage

Links (usually, exceptions are easily conceivable) a text, like a work or an expression, to an INT21 Text Passage from that text, e.g. a book to a passage on page three of this book.

has characteristics : transitive

has super-properties
R10 has passageop
has domain
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
has range
INT21 Text Passagec
is inverse of
R30i is text passage ofop

R30i is text passage ofop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R30i_isTextPassageOf

has characteristics : transitive

has super-properties
R10i is passage ofop
has domain
INT21 Text Passagec
has range
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
is inverse of
R30 has text passageop

R31 has image areaop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R31_hasImageArea

Links (usually, eceptions are easily conceivable) an image, like a work or an expression, to an INT22 Image Area from that image, e.g. a painting to an area on this paining.

has characteristics : transitive

has super-properties
R10 has passageop
has domain
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
has range
INT22 Image Areac
is inverse of
R31i is image area ofop

R31i is image area ofop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R31i_isImageAreaOf

has characteristics : transitive

has super-properties
R10i is passage ofop
has domain
INT22 Image Areac
has range
e73 information objectc or INT1 Passagec
is inverse of
R31 has image areaop

R3i is constellated byop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R3i_isConstellatedBy

has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
has range
INT Constellationc
is inverse of
R3 constellatesop

R4 definesop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R4_defines

Relates an actualization (usually: of the semantic feature 'INT Definition') to an INT11 Type of Interrelation, to INT4 Features, or to INT6 Architexts and thereby links e.g. a feature of text passage – e.g. a definition in Foucault's writings – to a concept - e.g. 'discourse'.
has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
has range
INT11 Type of Interrelationc or INT4 Featurec or INT6 Architextc
is inverse of
R4i is defined inop

R4i is defined inop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R4i_isDefinedIn

has domain
INT11 Type of Interrelationc or INT4 Featurec or INT6 Architextc
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
is inverse of
R4 definesop

R8 has opinion objectop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R8_hasOpinionObject

Links an INT Opinion to its object - for example an opinion with the theme fashion (to make it an opinion about fashion).
has super-properties
p67 refers toop
has domain
INT Opinionc
has range
thingc
is inverse of
R8i is opinion object ofop

R8i is opinion object ofop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R8i_isOpinionObjectOf

has super-properties
p67i is referred to byop
has domain
thingc
has range
INT Opinionc
is inverse of
R8 has opinion objectop

R9 has subsequent actualizationop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R9_hasSubsequentActualization

Links an INT2 Actualization of Feature to another INT4 following it (logically or chronologically); this object property was mostly designed for the representation of the structure of research papers, where one definition, interpretation, etc., follows another.

has characteristics : transitive

has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
is inverse of
R9i has preceding actualizationop

R9i has preceding actualizationop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R9i_hasPrecedingActualization

has characteristics : transitive

has domain
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
has range
INT2 Actualization of Featurec
is inverse of
R9 has subsequent actualizationop

Data Properties

R40 has bibliographical datadp back to ToC or Data Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R40_hasBibliographicalData

Links a text or image (work, expression, ...) to its bibliographical data, represented as a data string. (A shortcut for the actual modelling of bibliographical data.)
has domain
f1 workc or e73 information objectc
has range
string

R41 has locationdp back to ToC or Data Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R41_hasLocation

Defines the location of an INT16 Segment in e.g. a F3 Manifestation, e.g. by giving page or paragraph numbers. Can be replaced by oa:hasSelector to specify the location utilizing the multiple options provided by the Web Annotation Ontology (https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/#web-annotation-ontology).
has domain
INT16 Segmentc or INT1 Passagec
has range
string

R42 has paraphrase or definitiondp back to ToC or Data Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R42_hasParaphraseOrDefinition

Links pretty much everything to a data string providing a definition for it. (A shortcut for modelling the definition as an INT2 Actualization of Feature.)
has range
string

R43 has specificationdp back to ToC or Data Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R43_hasSpecification

Links a feature to a data string defining or describing it more closely.
has domain
INT4 Featurec
has range
string

R44 has wordingdp back to ToC or Data Property ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#R44_hasWording

Links an INT21 Text Passage or an INT16 Segment to a data string providing its exact wording.
has domain
INT16 Segmentc or INT1 Passagec

Named Individuals

1036708799ni back to ToC or Named Individual ToC

IRI: https://d-nb.info/gnd/1036708799

belongs to
personc

INTROni back to ToC or Named Individual ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408

belongs to
f2 expressionc

INTRO beta202001ni back to ToC or Named Individual ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202001

Date :
01/01/2020
Current version :
beta202001
Changes from version beta201901 to version beta202001: Some classes and relations could be resolved into types of intertextual relations; this concerned in particular the class INT5 Characteristic and adherent object relations. - Deleted class INT5 Characteristic, accordingly: deleted relations R1, R2, R14-16; changes on relations: R21, R23, R24 - Deleted relations R5, R6, R7 - Added class INT17 Functional Relation as a subclass of INT11 Type of Intertextual Relation. (2020-01)
belongs to
f2 expressionc

INTRO beta202210ni back to ToC or Named Individual ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202210

Date :
01/10/2022
Current version :
beta202210
Previous version :
https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202001 (visualise it with LODE )
Changes from version beta202001 to version beta202210: - A necessary modification was made on INT16: It was renamed "Segment" and its description was altered: The now more flexible INT16 can incorporate portions of e.g. F22 Self-contained Expressions of any size, meaning not only whole texts, but also INT1 Text Passages. - The INT16 is now also a direct subclass of E90 Symbolic Object. - Properties indicating position inside a document, that before related to INT1 Text Passage now also relate to INT16 Segment - since a Text Passage as taken from a F22 Self-contained Expression does not yet have the form of a published work and because of that can not be identified via e.g. page numbers (but only by indication of verse, act, chapter etc.). A INT16 as a part of a published text can. - After close examination it became clear that "r10 has text passage" (as well as the inversion) cannot be meaningfully related to "F1 Work", since "Work" cannot have text passages. As a result, "Work" was deleted from the domain of "r10 has text passage". - "r10" is now also no longer related to "F2 Expression", but to the parent class "E73 Information Object". This allows the modeling of text passages assigned to entities outside the narrow definition of the class "Expression" - since " Expression" by no means covers all written documents. - In domains/ranges throughout the model, "F2 Expression" was replaced with "E73 Information Object". - Erlangen-CRM and the related serialization of FRBRoo were replaced. - "INT0" in labels was replaced with "INT". - owl:import was deleted. - All named individuals were deleted. (2022-10)
belongs to
f2 expressionc

INTRO beta202304ni back to ToC or Named Individual ToC

IRI: https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202304

Date :
01/04/2023
Current version :
beta202304
Previous version :
https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202210 (visualise it with LODE )
Changes from version beta202210 to version beta202304: - A new property R16_incorporates and its inverse have been added to link the INT16_Segment - an E90_Symbolic_Object - to an E73_Information_Object it incorporates; a similar property already exists in CIDOC - P165_incorporates - but is limited to E73_Information_Object as a domain. A INT16_Segment can't be clearly classified as an E73_Information_Object. (2023-01) - A new subclass of INT9 Semantic Feature has been created: INT18 Reference. - "INT_Event" and "INT_State" are no longer subclasses of "INT_Plot" but sibling classes (and subclasses of "INT9_SemanticFeature") - since they are actually not a kind of plot, but rather an element in a plot. (2022-11)
belongs to
f2 expressionc

Annotation Properties

broad matchap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#broadMatch

creatorap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator

dateap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date

descriptionap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/description

issuedap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/issued

licenceap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://creativecommons.org/ns#licence

modifiedap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/modified

preferred namespace prefixap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/vocab/vann/preferredNamespacePrefix

preferred namespace u r iap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/vocab/vann/preferredNamespaceURI

r76 is derivative ofap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/R76_is_derivative_of

rightsap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/rights

titleap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title

Namespace Declarations back to ToC

default namespace
https://w3id.org/lso/intro/beta202408#
0-1
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
cidoc-crm
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/
dc
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
gnd
https://d-nb.info/gnd/
intro
https://w3id.org/lso/intro/
lrmoo
http://iflastandards.info/ns/lrm/lrmoo/
ns
http://creativecommons.org/ns#
oa
http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#
owl
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
rdf
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfs
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
skos
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
terms
http://purl.org/dc/terms/
vann
http://purl.org/vocab/vann/
voaf
http://purl.org/vocommons/voaf#
xsd
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

This HTML document was obtained by processing the OWL ontology source code through LODE, Live OWL Documentation Environment, developed by Silvio Peroni .